Haemolytic Disease of the Newborn may occur if the mother produces antibodies that cross the placenta and attack the foetuses red blood cells.
It can lead to  anaemia in the baby, and in severe cases the foetus may die in utero, or suffer neurological damage after birth due to high levels of bilirubin (kernicterus).

 

Mother and foetus.


Haemolytic Disease of the Newborn may occur if we have a Rh (D) negative mother  [RED dots] with an Rh (D) positive foetus [GREEN dots].

The Rh factor is the name given to a blood group protein, Rh (D), which is attached to red blood cells. Some people have this protein on their red blood cells and others do not.

On average, of every 100 people:

  • 85 will have the Rh factor; their blood type is called ‘Rh (D) positive’
  • 15 will not have the Rh factor; their blood type is called ‘Rh (D) negative’

Sensitising event:


During (or at the end of) her pregnancy, Rh (D) blood cells from the foetus enter the mothers blood stream (known as a sensitising event). Reasons for this occurring include:

  • tests such as amniocentesis
  • miscarriage
  • ectopic pregnancy
  • termination of pregnancy
  • abdominal trauma.
  • following delivery of Rh(D) positive baby1.

 

Mum produces antibodies:


This stimulates the mother to produce antibodies (the pink lines in the diagram) to destroy the Rh (D) positive blood cells in the maternal blood.  This RH (D) antibody response may remain for many years.

Antibody response to subsequent pregnancy:


The NEXT time the mother falls pregnant with an Rh (D) positive foetus, these antibodies may cross the placenta and attack the foetal red blood cells.
This can lead to Haemolytic Disease of the Newborn (HDN).

Prevention of HDN with Rh (D) immunoglobulin. Anti D.


As before, Rh (D) positive blood cells from the foetus may cross into the mothers bloodstream.

Rh (D) immunoglobulin given:


Within 72 hours, a dose of Rh(D) immunoglobulin is administered.
Rh (D) immunoglobulin is obtained form the fractionated plasma of blood donors.
Once administered, the Rh (D) immunoglobulin removes the Rh (D) positive red blood cells from the maternal bloodstream.
With these red blood cells removed, the mothers immune system is not activated and no maternal antibodies are produced.

Blood should be drawn from the mother prior to giving the immunoglobulin to assess the level of foetalmaternal hemorrhage. If the hemorrhage is larger than that covered by the initial dose of immunoglobulin additional dose(s) may be required.

No immune response:

Therefore at the next pregnancy there are no circulating antibodies to attack the foetal red blood cells.

In Australia Anti-D immunoglobulin is given to to all Rh negative women  at 28 and 34 weeks gestation as prophylaxis against small amounts of foetal maternal bleeding that can occur in the absence of observable sensitising events. This is known as routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP).

Giving Rh(D) immunoglobulin (Anti-D):

Dosage:

The recommended dose of anti-D immunoglobulin is

  • 250 IU after sensitising events in the first trimester of pregnancy and
  • 625 IU after sensitising events beyond the first trimester.

Should be given ASAP and within 72 hrs of sensitising event.

If the gestational age is not known with certainty and the possibility exists that the gestational age is 13 weeks or more, 625 IU should be given.

Administration:

  1. Should be administered at room temp.
  2. Give IMI slowly.
  3. If dose more than 5ml then divide and give at different sites.

Contraindications:

  1. Rh(D) Positive mother.
  2. individuals with isolated Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency, unless they have been tested and shown not to have circulating anti-IgA antibodies
  3. Mothers with severe thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders that would contraindicate IM injections.

Precautions:

  1. NOT to be administered IVI (high risk of anaphylactic reaction).
  2. Monitor closely if mother has history of allergic reactions following human immunoglobulin preparations.

Pathogen risk:

Anti-D manufactured from human plasma. Potential risk of virus (inluding Hep B, HIV, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease), but this if very low due to screening process for donors and viral inactivation processes during the manufacturing process.

————————————————————————-

Read more:

Haemolytic Disease of the Newborn.

Guidelines on the propylactic use of RH (D) immunoglobulin (anit D) in obstetrics PDF.

Full product information guide (PDF).

  1. A small number (1.5 – 1.8%) of Rh negative mothers are immunised by their Rh positive foetuses despite administration of anti-D immunoglobulin postpartum. Studies have shown that this number can be reduced to less than 1.0% by administering two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin, the first at 28 weeks gestation and the second following delivery. []

4 Responses to “Rh (D) immunoglobulin (anti-D).”

  1. Ian, I would like to use this as an information sheet for my antenatal women, is that ok? Your graphics are just what I have been looking for! Due credit given of course!

  2. Great article Ian, however a quick question – in the subsequent pregnancy (after immunoglobulin is given during the first one) are you still able to get the ‘sensitising’ event and production of antibodies?

    I guess what I’m getting at, is will the Rh Neg mother have to have immunoglobulin with EVERY pregnancy (where the foetus is Rh Pos).

    • Good question Nick.
      At first I thought yes, but then I second guessed myself……
      After consulting with my midwife partner, I can tell you that yes, the Rh Neg mum will need Anti D every pregnancy.
      And in Australia it is given as prophylaxis at 28 and 34 wks gestation.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • mean arterial pressure. (29)
    • James Senior said: Thank you, for a beautiful description of MAP…always love to use your material as a reference. James

    • ofelia said: Never heard about MAP before today, I had been taking medication for high blood pressure for10 years, until I found a Dr. that told me that I could get rid of the pills with alternative medicine, been off the pills for three months now, and there are days that I worry about my readings, even though most of them are within normal...

  • New graduate nurses, do we need them….or not? (10)
    • John said: It’s not a failure of leadership but a plan to destabilize our medical system and fully privatize it. No more medicare, user pays, just like in the U.S. Also an excuse to import foreigners, give them citizinship, then use there citizinship to increase Australia’s international debt borrowing. No, you won’t read that...

  • nurses fuck cancer. (3)
    • Rachel said: I agree with you Fabbia. No matter how much we try to be good at educating our patients, at the end it is still up to the patient’s decision whether to follow what we have said or not. On our side, at least we know we have given whats the best for them. We can’t touch every patient’s lives always.

  • yes. I am going to write a book. (11)
    • Brad Winter said: Nice work Ian! I hope you find your book writing mojo and get it published – it’s a new challenge and I think we all know you’re up for it. Good luck!

  • Nurses…show us your pouches! (10)
    • Sarah said: I have a lot of pockets. A LOT. However I may be tempted over to the pouch side

  • killing the cardiac arrest mind donk. (3)
    • Leigh said: Re: assembling the team. On the phone to reception “code (…ummm) RED in resus!!”…reception “do you mean code blue?” “YES!! that one”. Should have assembled self first. Thanks reception.

  • hardcore nursing revolution. (15)
    • Leigh said: inspiring piece Ian! thanks. And Stephen, great summary too! “The amazing thing about us is, no information is too important for our concern; no job is too low to tackle ourselves. We are the proverbial jack of all practitioners.” love it